Tim Ballering's Top Landlord Links

Milwaukee MIami Reference
Property Info: DNSAssessor FL State PageYoga MapsSex Offender Maps
Milw JournalJS ArchiveFox 6 Miami HeraldCNNHNNYTWSJ TranslateTranslate URL
Milwaukee Weather Miami WeatherNHC LLCs CreateLook upApply for EIN
DNS (Code Enforcement) Phone List Hipmunk * GoogleSW Mortgage CalculatorMLS DILHR
Milwaukee Home Page Loopnet
OrdinancesCouncil Calender State of Wisconsin Home Page

Wisconsin Laws

Wisconsin §704 (Landlord -Tenant Statute)
Wisconsin §799 (Eviction & Small Claims) WI Statutes Home Page
ATCP 134 (Consumer Protection Laws) Known by many as the Ag rules, this the section that has caused owners the most grief. If you mess up here you face double damages and have to pay your tenant's attorney. Read this and then reread it to insure that your practices are in compliance.
The Department of Consumer Protection "Wisconsin Way" provides a plain english review of this law.
Wisconsin Law Overview with links

Case Law

Wisconsin Federal General
Court of Appeals Supreme Court Google Legal
Supreme Court. 7th Circuit (covers Wisconsin) Wisconsin Law Library
Admin Code Case Law All Circuits WI Court Forms
WI Appellate Briefs

Important WI case law

Three & One Company v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400, 504 N.W.2d 393 (Ct. App. 1993), the Wisconsin Court of Appeals found that tenants who allowed their cats to use the unit as a litter box committed waste. If waste is found the owner is entitled to double the damages pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 844.19.
Baierl d/b/a Supreme Builders v. McTaggart, Wis. Supreme Court, Case #98-3329 (2001). Because a lease contained a provision specifically prohibited by ATCP 134, the landlord could not enforce the lease against the tenant. The court declined to sever the illegal provision and enforce the rest of the lease, because that would undermine the policy behind ATCP 134.
Dawson v. Goldammer In Dawson v. Goldammer, 2003 WI App 3 (Dawson I), the court of appeals held that a tenant may seek enforcement of a rental agreement that includes an attorney fee provision that violates Wisconsin Administrative Code section ATCP 134.08(3). In the case at bar, the court held that when a tenant seeks enforcement of such a lease, the tenant can sever the attorney fee provision and enforce the remainder of the lease. The court therefore reversed the part of the circuit court's judgment that awarded attorney fees to the landlords, but it affirmed the circuit court's rulings on all other disputed grounds (see ¶ 1).